(no subject)
Nov. 28th, 2003 03:28 pmI ask the question, how do I know.
But I cannot explain how I know something that is beyond the bounds of imperfect language.
Because all language is imperfect, and always will be...there is no way beyond the imperfection in language because we cannot describe ourselves perfectly because we are imperfect due to the own prisons we create around ourselves, which might be automatical after all.
The prisons we create are what prevent us from acting purely on what we want to act.
We create the prison of absurd (But remember, absurd is a word, prison by language)
We create the prison of wrong (Wrong, also a word, not a definition, the meaning it portrays is just more language, more language that cannot be broken down, because language is imperfect in that way)
We create all of our prisons and we constantly work against the contradictions inside of ourselves.
How can we, then, learn anything, if we are always imprisoned.
Instead of think, we must know. Instead of try, we must do. Words are a prison.
But I cannot explain how I know something that is beyond the bounds of imperfect language.
Because all language is imperfect, and always will be...there is no way beyond the imperfection in language because we cannot describe ourselves perfectly because we are imperfect due to the own prisons we create around ourselves, which might be automatical after all.
The prisons we create are what prevent us from acting purely on what we want to act.
We create the prison of absurd (But remember, absurd is a word, prison by language)
We create the prison of wrong (Wrong, also a word, not a definition, the meaning it portrays is just more language, more language that cannot be broken down, because language is imperfect in that way)
We create all of our prisons and we constantly work against the contradictions inside of ourselves.
How can we, then, learn anything, if we are always imprisoned.
Instead of think, we must know. Instead of try, we must do. Words are a prison.