sathor: (Default)
sathor ([personal profile] sathor) wrote2010-12-17 02:10 am

Ramble

So...going back to a statement that came out of an acid trip back in 2005, Hitler Had the Right Idea.

What I mean by this is that I think Hitler had the right idea...with the kind of unity he was creating. That sort of unity can not be achieved by a nation of "freedom" or "liberty". In truth, America isn't free at all - we like to talk about it like it is, like we have freedom of thought, freedom of speech, freedom of opportunity and choice...in reality, we have none of these things, but we also do not have the unity which Nazi Germany achieved. As a result, we are going to decline - we are already in a state of it, in fact.

We do not have freedom of choice, or opportunity. Those of us who are not incredibly poor, or rich, can not gain the education necessary to have opportunity without indentured service. One could easily argue that the amount of debt remaining from a necessary "higher education" is likely worse than the debt incurred by poor immigrants during colonization.

We do not have freedom of speech, or thought. The consequences of radical ideology - and more importantly - being outspoken about it - are far reaching. Socially, devastating. One can lose all degree of credibility by being an advocate for ideas that are not part of popular opinion, that aren't expressed via the media and most methods of common consumption of information.

We have none of these freedoms, and our level of nationalism is essentially nonexistent in comparison to Nazi Germany.

Hitler had the right idea. He was a fascist, he was a genocidal sociopath. But he had the right idea. And I can understand why a philosopher like Heidegger was attracted to the power of the Nazi Party. It united people, regardless of their societal status, and gave them a higher purpose. It brought people together under one unified ideal - to produce a utopian society that would reign for eternity. And if we desire to survive as a race, we will need to achieve this end eventually, whether we like collectivism or not. The power of atomic weapons, and the threat of global catastrophe, is far too high to not.

[identity profile] noximist.livejournal.com 2010-12-17 09:52 pm (UTC)(link)

I'm pretty sure I tried to support you in your bid to be a musician before, and you blew me off because life is such an awful place. Musicians don't make much money, and you already know that... and whenever someone has suggested a way you -could- make money from music, like teaching others, being a studio musician, or taking on another job on the side, you've scoffed. I ran the numbers when I was considering becoming a full-time writer/editor, and the numbers weren't enough for me. We're different in that way, though, and my point was that if you want to do that, the more power to you. You're free to do so.

I think it's time I stopped commenting here. We've disagreed about many things over the years, but the whole Nazi Germany thing is just... too much for me. Yeah, you feel hard done by and you probably have been, but complaining about America and then looking at a country that killed millions of its own people in order to improve the lives of those who were the correct race as an example of -unification- is disgusting.

[identity profile] sathor.livejournal.com 2010-12-18 04:11 am (UTC)(link)
I'm not saying killing jews is justified. I'm saying jewish people who weren't native to germany had supposedly become incredibly wealthy, destroying the standard of living for germans, Besides that, if they really were an elite bourgeois class, the german's had every right to toss them out. They didn't have a right to murder them, but that wasn't exactly the intention from the beginning either - in my opinion - that doesn't mean it's the reality, but at least the idea of redistributing wealth is on the right track. The idea of removing an economic class of people that is unnecessary in the industrial era is on the right track.

We have essentially the same amount of disparity that existed in feudal empires...why is this acceptable? We have improved our lives in every other way, manufacturing has become child's play essentially, but we can not distribute wealth more equitably?

Are you ignoring the atrocities that America and its western allies have committed? Why are these past and present wars morally acceptable to you, more so than the forced removal of jews out of Germany, or the killing of those jews? Is it okay that it took Germany essentially until the 1980s to rebuild itself, when as you said, most of the people were "carried along" by the nazi party? Thanks to sanctions and penalties by our fair nations?

Is it okay that we gave their scientists asylum, forgave their war crimes, and have utilized their technology to allow for a great deal of the technology we have today?

If nazi germany is so fundamentally evil to you, why is it you accept the evils of our empires?

Let me at the least, point this out:

Well over six million innocents have died as a direct result of American imperialism. I can guarantee that - I'm pretty sure you know it's true. Just because Nazi Germany seemed to be selectively slaying a particular race, does not make it any more evil than the killing of six million people of various ancestry. Neither does the killing of that number of decades, or hundreds of years.

Are you forgetting about native americans? America created an empire from the east to west, brutally murdering these peoples and taking all of their natural resources, wealth and land, and then leaving them to poverty. It sounds pretty familiar to me.

I think it is very dangerous to ignore these things and hold up a group like Nazi Germany as though it is the epitome of evil. Unless you believe human beings are inherently evil, it would be hard to explain why so many people, well educated and not, were attracted to it. But hey, they had propaganda just like we do today - and ours is far more effective - and maybe that explains why people of the west have a strong tendency to ignore what's going on, and always point their fingers outward.

[identity profile] sathor.livejournal.com 2010-12-18 04:27 am (UTC)(link)
And you know, I'm sorry you feel that way Sarah. But you went personal with me. How would you feel if I said to you, that even though you think you're doing everything right, I don't really think you're going to end up doing as well as you hope to do?

I'm well aware of the fact that my decisions are going to lead to a life of poverty. I don't need to be reminded of the fact that the world doesn't have a place for someone like me.

But if that's it for our conversations, best of luck to you.

[identity profile] sathor.livejournal.com 2010-12-19 02:27 am (UTC)(link)
And in truth, it breaks my heart to think that you are so set in your mindset and beliefs now, that you can not take a moment to see it from my perspective, or understand where I am coming from. I really did not intend to hurt your feelings, and I don't really feel like a disagreement means the end of the friendship. It really does break my heart. I am sorry if I have become a person that you can no longer respect. In truth, I have a hard time respecting myself, or having any faith that my future will be bright to any degree. But I must go on, or else perish. Those are the choices I am left with.